Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Cenozoic
Mesozoic
Paleozoic
Neoproterozoic
Mesoproterozoic
Paleoproterozoic

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Sanu Formation
Click to display on map of the Ancient World at:
Sanu Fm base reconstruction

Sanu Fm


Period: 
Cretaceous, Paleogene

Age Interval: 
Santonian to Late Paleocene


Province: 
NW.India Rajastan-Jaisalmer Basin

Type Locality and Naming

OUTCROP. Sanu village with type section exposed in Pariwar Hill located west of village Pariwar. [Original Publication: Dasgupta, S.K., Dhar C.L. and Mehta V.K. 1973. Progress report in Western Rajasthan Shelf, ONGC report (unpublished)]. The formation was first designated by Dasgupta et al. (1973) after village Sanu with type section at Pariwar hill, in the west of Pariwar village. Reference well: Interval 79-1008m in well Kharatar and interval 1340-2020m in well Lang-2.

Synonyms: Narayanan et al., (1961) described this litho-unit as “Upper Habur Bed” which was later on disagreed by Willm (1964) and Dasgupta et al (1973). Willm (1964) included it in Pariwar Fm. Dasgupta et al (ibid) opined that the “Pariwar Formation” of Willm (1964) and Upper Habur beds of Narayanan et al (ibid) can be better described as Sanu Formation of Paleocene age. Singh (1984) subdivided this formation (in subsurface) into two members, namely, Mohammad Dhani Sandstone Member and Kharatar Marl Member with definite local localities.


Lithology and Thickness

Sandstone and marl. The formation is composed of reddish unconsolidated, current bedded, glauconitic sandstone. A maximum thickness of 20 m has been reported by Dasgupta et al. (1973) around Pariwar village. In subsurface it is 670 m in Shahgarh sub-basin. There is a general reduction in thickness towards the eastern part of the basin.

The formation is composed in the reference well Kharatar-1 is divisible into

(a) Mohammad Dhani Member (Sandstone) comprising medium- to coarse-grained sandstone, friable, clean and moderately sorted. The basal part of the sandstone is argillaceous with layers of chocolate brown clay. Lignite streaks and grey shale also characterize the upper part of the unit

(b) Kharatar Member (Marl) comprises greenish grey fine to coarse-grained argillaceous feebly calcareous sandstone. It is overlain by clayey, light greenish grey, glauconitic limestone intercalated with marl. The upper part comprises of dark grey to black fissile shale and sandstone interbeds. The sandstone is light grey, medium- to coarse-grained with streak of lignite. The top of the member is marked by chocolate brown silty shale/ clay. The formation in the outcrop is devoid of microfauna. In the subsurface, limestone and marl in the upper part is rich in foraminifera and ostracods. Sigal et al (1971), Singh (1976.1984) and Singh and Sharma (1990) and Bhandari (1992,1995 and 1996) have reported a rich foraminiferal and ostracod assemblage, respectively, from the Kharatar Member.

[Figure 1: Location map of West Rajasthan Basins (after Pandey and Dave, 1998)]

[Figure 2: Lithocolumn and Field Photograph of Te-Tekkar Scarp Section, Facies Analysis, Reservoir Characterization and Depositional Environment study of Hydrocarbon bearing Tertiary Sequences in Jaisalmer Basin, Rajasthan (after R. Pandey et.al., 2019) ONGC Bulletin, Vol. 54, No.1)]

[Figure 3: Lithofacies of Sanu Fm, Facies Analysis, Reservoir Characterization and Depositional Environment study of Hydrocarbon bearing Tertiary Sequences in Jaisalmer Basin, Rajasthan (after R. Pandey et.al., 2019), ONGC Bulletin, Vol. 54, No.1)]

[Figure 4: Generalized and Subsurface Stratigraphy of Jaisalmer Basin (from dghindia.gov.in)]


Lithology Pattern: 
Sandstone


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

The lower boundary is a major unconformity. The formation overlies Pariwar Fm in north-eastern areas and in south-western part it overlies Habur Fm. In subsurface, it overlies Parh Fm in basinward areas and Goru Fm in shoreward areas.

Upper contact

The upper boundary is conformable with overlying Khuiala Fm in subsurface and in the outcrops it is unconformable.

Regional extent

[Figure 5: Stratigraphic Correlation of Rajasthan Basins (from dghindia.gov.in)]


GeoJSON

{"type":"Feature","geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":[[[[70.32,27.14],[71.87,27.6],[71.63,27.42],[71.98,27.15],[71.63,26.44],[71.01,26.32],[70.7,26.52],[70.32,27.14]]]]}}

Fossils

The characteristic foraminifera include, Planororalities pseudomenardii, Morozovella velascoensis, P. pusilla pusilla, P. chapmani, P. compressa, M. angulata, Discocyclina seunesi, D. ranikotensis, Assilina dandotica and Miscellanea miscella. The characteristic ostracodes include: Acanthocythereis retispinata, Brachycythere rajasthanensis, Hermanites crecens, Protobuntonia ghotaruensis, Macrocypris guhai, Acanthocythereis procapsus, Cytherelloides jaisalmerensis, phalcocytehre improcera, Anommatocythere indica and Echinocythereis context.


Age 

The faunal assemblage recorded suggest Late Paleocene age. The lower unfossiliferous part could not be dated however based on its stratigraphic position it is inferred to be of Paleocene age. (ca. 60 to 58 Ma)

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Santonian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.0

    Beginning date (Ma): 
85.70

    Ending stage: 
Thanetian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
1.0

    Ending date (Ma):  
56.00

Depositional setting

The basal part of Sanu Formation is inferred to have been been deposited under continental environment with little marine influence. The limestone with glauconitic sandstone with intercalated shale in the upper part has yielded planktic and benthic foraminifers indicative of middle shelf conditions.


Depositional pattern:  


Additional Information


Compiler:  

D.S.N Raju